Re: DRAFT 9.6 release

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Date: 2016-08-31 01:39:24
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTtCyzBUKO9bQyVPTdZncFTovjW2MzoOWTkLjHt=MkX7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> ??? It's always been possible for me to give multiple standbys the same
> name, making a de-facto group.

A "group" grammar, by that I mean an alias referring to a set of
nodes, is not supported. And you can still define multiple entries
with the same name.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2016-08-31 01:42:23 Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2016-08-31 01:35:07 Re: DRAFT 9.6 release