From: | "John Vincent" <lusis(dot)org(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tim Allen" <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au>, "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SAN performance mystery |
Date: | 2006-06-19 12:58:47 |
Message-ID: | c841561b0606190558r693b18c6rfbf2d688cf9d5d92@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> I'd have to agree with you about the specific SAN/setup you're working
> with there. I certainly disagree that it's a general property of SAN's
> though. We've got a DS4300 with FC controllers and drives, hosts are
> generally dual-controller load-balanced and it works quite decently.
How are you guys doing the load balancing? IIRC, the RDAC driver only does
failover. Or are you using the OS level multipathing instead? While we were
on the 4300 for our AIX boxes, we just created two big RAID5 LUNs and
assigned one to each controller. With 2 HBAs and LVM stripping that was
about the best we could get in terms of load balancing.
Indeed, the EMC SANs are generally the high-priced ones too, so not
> really sure what to tell you about the poor performance you're seeing
> out of it. Your IT folks and/or your EMC rep. should be able to resolve
> that, really...
The only exception I've heard to this is the Clarion AX150. We looked at one
and we were warned off of it by some EMC gearheads.
Enjoy,
>
> Stephen
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFElpuRrzgMPqB3kigRAuo8AJ9vlxRK7VPMb9rN7AFm/qMNHLbdBwCfZiih
> ZHApIcDhhj/J/Es9KPXEl/s=
> =25MX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Vincent | 2006-06-19 12:59:48 | Re: SAN performance mystery |
Previous Message | John Vincent | 2006-06-19 12:54:18 | Re: SAN performance mystery |