| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SAN performance mystery |
| Date: | 2006-06-19 12:41:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20060619124153.GQ8588@kenobi.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
* Tim Allen (tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au) wrote:
> The conclusion I'm drawing here is that this SAN does not perform at all
> well, and is not a good database platform. It's sounding from replies
> from other people that this might be a general property of SAN's, or at
> least the ones that are not stratospherically priced.
I'd have to agree with you about the specific SAN/setup you're working
with there. I certainly disagree that it's a general property of SAN's
though. We've got a DS4300 with FC controllers and drives, hosts are
generally dual-controller load-balanced and it works quite decently.
Indeed, the EMC SANs are generally the high-priced ones too, so not
really sure what to tell you about the poor performance you're seeing
out of it. Your IT folks and/or your EMC rep. should be able to resolve
that, really...
Enjoy,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Vincent | 2006-06-19 12:54:18 | Re: SAN performance mystery |
| Previous Message | Tim Allen | 2006-06-19 10:28:07 | Re: SAN performance mystery |