From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [17] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER |
Date: | 2024-01-15 20:53:04 |
Message-ID: | c7185435-eb8c-426d-beac-9aaa7e972d02@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/12/24 20:17, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 16:11 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> I don't think we need to add a test for every FDW. E.g. adding a test
>> in file_fdw would be pointless. But postgres_fdw is special. The test
>> could further create a foreign table ftab_foo on subscriber
>> referencing foo on publisher and then compare the data from foo and
>> ftab_foo to make sure that the replication is happening. This will
>> serve as a good starting point for replicated tables setup in a
>> sharded cluster.
>>
>
> Attached updated patch set with added TAP test for postgres_fdw, which
> uses a postgres_fdw server as the source for subscription connection
> information.
>
> I think 0004 needs a bit more work, so I'm leaving it off for now, but
> I'll bring it back in the next patch set.
I took a quick scan through the patch. The only thing that jumped out at
me was that it seems like it might make sense to use
quote_literal_cstr() rather than defining your own appendEscapedValue()
function?
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-01-15 21:03:24 | Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2024-01-15 20:42:10 | Re: Custom explain options |