Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?
Date: 2019-09-26 20:48:30
Message-ID: c686b428-aa98-199e-e3ff-384fac3c3c76@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-09-25 22:21, David Steele wrote:
> While testing against PG12 I noticed the documentation states that
> recovery targets are not valid when standby.signal is present.
>
> But surely the exception is recovery_target_timeline? My testing
> confirms that this works just as in prior versions with standy_mode=on.

Or maybe we should move recovery_target_timeline to a different section?
But which one?

I don't know if recovery_target_timeline is actually useful to change in
standby mode.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-09-26 20:57:54 Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2019-09-26 20:36:46 Re: Memory Accounting