| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Soumyadeep Chakraborty <sochakraborty(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, soumyadeep2007(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Memory Accounting |
| Date: | 2019-09-26 20:36:46 |
| Message-ID: | 57780817877d4b40106b248b63261e21a7a56261.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 21:22 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> It's worth mentioning that those bechmarks (I'm assuming we're
> talking
> about the numbers Rober shared in [1]) were done on patches that used
> the eager accounting approach (i.e. walking all parent contexts and
> updating the accounting for them).
>
> I'm pretty sure the current "lazy accounting" patches don't have that
> issue, so unless someone objects and/or can show numbers
> demonstrating
> I'wrong I'll stick to my plan to get this committed soon.
That was my conclusion, as well.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-09-26 20:48:30 | Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-09-26 20:27:04 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |