Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-13 14:13:40
Message-ID: c5337591-cde3-9e2f-dd41-897b4d45d432@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amul,

On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.
>

This patch needs a rebase.

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-13 14:14:07 Re: SCRAM protocol documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-13 14:11:23 Re: psql: new help related to variables are not too readable