From: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
Date: | 2017-09-14 08:58:49 |
Message-ID: | CAAJ_b97-Kozgn0xZ5wTCrUJ5NDev3vcjGHFCOAOMTVhrQur_xw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com
> wrote:
> Hi Amul,
>
> On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
>
>> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.
>>
>>
> This patch needs a rebase.
>
>
Thanks for your note.
Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head.
Also added error on
creating
d
efault partition
for the hash partitioned table
,
and updated document &
test script for the same.
Regards,
Amul
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v19.patch | application/octet-stream | 85.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-09-14 09:01:36 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition b |
Previous Message | Mithun Cy | 2017-09-14 08:53:40 | Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() |