From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures |
Date: | 2017-11-21 18:44:36 |
Message-ID: | c520398e-1a20-5db1-636a-e50a7e662853@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/20/2017 04:25 PM, I wrote:
> I've been through this fairly closely, and I think it's pretty much
> committable. The only big item that stands out for me is the issue of
> OUT parameters.
>
> While returning multiple result sets will be a useful feature, it's also
> very common in my experience for stored procedures to have scalar out
> params as well. I'm not sure how we should go about providing for it,
> but I think we need to be sure we're not closing any doors.
>
> Here, for example, is how the MySQL stored procedure feature works with
> JDBC:
> <https://dev.mysql.com/doc/connector-j/5.1/en/connector-j-usagenotes-statements-callable.html>
> I think it will be OK if we use cursors to return multiple result sets,
> along the lines of Peter's next patch, but we shouldn't regard that as
> the end of the story. Even if we don't provide for it in this go round
> we should aim at eventually providing for stored procedure OUT params.
>
>
>
Of course it's true that we could replace a scalar OUT parameter with a
one row resultset if we have return of multiple resultsets from SPs. But
it's different from the common use pattern and a darn sight more
cumbersome to use.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-21 19:47:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: protocol version negotiation (Re: Libpq PGRES_COPY_BOTH - version compatibility) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-11-21 18:27:46 | Re: Logical Replication and triggers |