Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped
Date: 2025-03-03 09:05:23
Message-ID: c425dbaa-df6e-4c03-8329-21944ce56aea@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025/01/10 23:50, jian he wrote:
> hi.
> seems no regress tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped.
>
> CopyFrom
> pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED,
> cstate->num_errors);
>
> there is coverage for it. but in regress test, we didn't really print
> out this value (cstate->num_errors)
>
> The attached patch did minor changes on src/test/regress/sql/copy.sql.
> so we can check if pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_COPY_TUPLES_SKIPPED..)
> is working as intended or not.

Thanks for the patch!

The patch basically looks good to me.
I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached.

Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Add-regression-tests-for-pg_stat_progress_copy.tu.patch text/plain 4.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Suraj Kharage 2025-03-03 09:13:40 Re: Support for NO INHERIT to INHERIT state change with named NOT NULL constraints
Previous Message Benoit Lobréau 2025-03-03 09:03:44 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication