Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tests for pg_stat_progress_copy.tuples_skipped
Date: 2025-03-04 08:57:49
Message-ID: CACJufxG8_2d4e1nqeP6bstSTBZEBuX8sdbuPSpzxFsbWNp_cwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:05 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> The patch basically looks good to me.
> I’ve made some minor cosmetic adjustments — the updated patch is attached.
>
> Unless there are any objections, I'm thinking to commit it.
>

I checked it again manually.
It looks good to me.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-03-04 09:02:57 Re: 64 bit numbers vs format strings
Previous Message Przemysław Sztoch 2025-03-04 08:54:30 encode/decode support for base64url