| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Interrupts vs signals |
| Date: | 2024-11-15 14:24:37 |
| Message-ID: | c3e9de97-6073-47bf-8580-0435ed702bab@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Here is also a version of Thomas's "Use Latch for bgworker state change
notification patch", rebased over the "Replace latches with Interrupts"
patch.
I used INTERRUPT_GENERAL_WAKEUP for the notification, as a
straightforward replacement of setting the latch, but I wonder if we
should have a dedicated interrupt flag for this instead.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0003-Use-proc-interrupt-for-bgworker-state-change-noti.patch | text/x-patch | 23.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2024-11-15 14:32:17 | Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases |
| Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2024-11-15 13:58:51 | Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting |