| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases |
| Date: | 2024-11-15 14:32:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20241115143217.43.nmisch@google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Noah Misch
> > I'm hearing the only confirmed impact on non-assert builds is the need to
> > recompile timescaledb. (It's unknown whether recompiling will suffice for
> > timescaledb. For assert builds, six PGXN extensions need recompilation.)
>
> Which 6 extensions are these?
>
> I re-ran the tests on all the extensions on apt.pg.o and didn't see
> any failures (timescale and age are already rebuilt).
I counted wrong, it's the five here:
https://postgr.es/m/20241114143524.91.nmisch@google.com
They are AGE and the four others you found not to be part of apt.pg.o.
(timescaledb is not part of PGXN, so it's not one of the five.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-11-15 14:43:32 | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-11-15 14:24:37 | Re: Interrupts vs signals |