Re: Interrupts vs signals

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Interrupts vs signals
Date: 2024-11-15 12:39:15
Message-ID: c272c49d-cd7e-4897-aed7-76dc517607fc@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/11/2024 21:41, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I pushed the preliminary cleanup patches from this patch set earlier,
> only the main patches remain. Attached is a new version of those, with
> mostly comment cleanups.

Another rebased version attached, no other changes. I think this is
pretty much ready to be committed, but I'd love to get some review.

After this, some work remains to publish the compatibility header on the
wiki, along with some instructions on how to upgrade your extension code.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Replace-Latches-with-Interrupts.patch text/x-patch 220.0 KB
v4-0002-Fix-lost-wakeup-issue-in-logical-replication-laun.patch text/x-patch 4.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2024-11-15 12:54:33 Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-11-15 12:22:21 Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall