Re: Transactional DDL

> > On 6/2/07, *Jasbinder Singh Bali* <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com
> > <mailto:jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/2/07, *Michael Glaesemann* < grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net
> > <mailto:grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 2, 2007, at 11:08 , Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> >
> > > Whats so novel about postgresql here?
> > > This would happen in any RDBMS. right?
> > > You induced divide by zero exception that crashed the whole
> > > transaction and it did not create the table bar?
> >
>
> No, it doesn't
>

then informix is better than oracle in this point. last time i try
this on informix it did the right thing...

sadly enough, i don't have an informix database at hand to confirm if
my memory has no corrupted indexes ;)

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook