From: | "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jasbinder Singh Bali" <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, "Alexander Staubo" <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transactional DDL |
Date: | 2007-06-02 22:46:43 |
Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0706021546h6881345doa2c2d57e62b27801@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/2/07, PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >> This is what happens in every RDBMS. Whats so special about postgres
> >> then?
>
> mysql> BEGIN;
> Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
>
> mysql> CREATE TABLE blehhhh ( id INTEGER ) ENGINE=InnoDB;
> Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.09 sec)
>
> mysql> INSERT INTO blehhhh VALUES (1),(2),(3);
> Query OK, 3 rows affected (0.02 sec)
> Records: 3 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
>
> mysql> ROLLBACK;
> Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
>
> mysql> SELECT * FROM blehhhh;
> +------+
> | id |
> +------+
> | 1 |
> | 2 |
> | 3 |
> +------+
> 3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>
>
Tom's example seems to show that mysql inserts a commit immidiatelly
after a DDL but this one example shows the thing is worse than that.
if that is the case this 3 rows should have been gone with the
rollback.
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2007-06-02 22:51:15 | Re: Transactional DDL |
Previous Message | Madison Kelly | 2007-06-02 22:45:21 | Re: High-availability |