From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance? |
Date: | 2006-01-05 17:08:23 |
Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0601050908n62354638i9db44b05dd015411@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 1/5/06, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Russ Brown (pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > Oh, that's a long story. We're a MySQL house that I've been trying to
> > convert to PostgreSQL one way or the other for ages (with no success as
> > yet). Note that the argument isn't about which letter the type
> > truncation applies to, but whether it actually has anything to do
> > with ACID at all in the first place. The key for me is that the result of this argument has an
> > effect on the question: "Is MySQL ACID compliant". If I'm right, it's
> > not (which has political strategic benefits to me).
>
> An even better thing to point out is that a DBA recommending MySQL isn't
> a DBA at all. :)
>
or is one that _loves risk_ ;)
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Dean | 2006-01-05 17:39:30 | Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-01-05 16:38:25 | Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance? |