Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance?
Date: 2006-01-05 16:38:25
Message-ID: 20060105163825.GZ6026@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

* Russ Brown (pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Oh, that's a long story. We're a MySQL house that I've been trying to
> convert to PostgreSQL one way or the other for ages (with no success as
> yet). Note that the argument isn't about which letter the type
> truncation applies to, but whether it actually has anything to do
> with ACID at all in the first place. The key for me is that the result of this argument has an
> effect on the question: "Is MySQL ACID compliant". If I'm right, it's
> not (which has political strategic benefits to me).

An even better thing to point out is that a DBA recommending MySQL isn't
a DBA at all. :)

Enjoy,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2006-01-05 17:08:23 Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance?
Previous Message Russ Brown 2006-01-05 16:33:15 Re: 'Official' definition of ACID compliance?