Re: multi-master pgbench?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multi-master pgbench?
Date: 2012-08-22 03:35:39
Message-ID: c1c958d8d36db7cad3e8f67044b9c632@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> The point of this functionality is to test some cluster
> software which have a capability to create multi-master
> configuration.

As the maintainer of software that does multi-master, I'm a little
confused as to why we would extend pg_bench to do this. The software
in question should be doing the testing itself, ideally via
it's test suite (i.e. "make test"). Having pg_bench do any of this
would be at best a very poor subset of the tests the software
should be performing. I suppose if the software *uses* pg_bench for
its tests already, once could argue a limited test case - but it seems
difficult to design some pg_bench options generic and powerful enough
to handle other cases outside of the one software this change is aimed at.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201208212330
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlA0UvsACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjALgCgw2cGI3eWR5fBGkoX9hqV1N39
OSEAn2ZIxrNRCdkDfKVrMmx2PsQTs8ZS
=Xhqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-08-22 04:12:31 Re: multi-master pgbench?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2012-08-22 03:04:05 Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation