From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: multi-master pgbench? |
Date: | 2012-08-22 03:35:39 |
Message-ID: | c1c958d8d36db7cad3e8f67044b9c632@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> The point of this functionality is to test some cluster
> software which have a capability to create multi-master
> configuration.
As the maintainer of software that does multi-master, I'm a little
confused as to why we would extend pg_bench to do this. The software
in question should be doing the testing itself, ideally via
it's test suite (i.e. "make test"). Having pg_bench do any of this
would be at best a very poor subset of the tests the software
should be performing. I suppose if the software *uses* pg_bench for
its tests already, once could argue a limited test case - but it seems
difficult to design some pg_bench options generic and powerful enough
to handle other cases outside of the one software this change is aimed at.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201208212330
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlA0UvsACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjALgCgw2cGI3eWR5fBGkoX9hqV1N39
OSEAn2ZIxrNRCdkDfKVrMmx2PsQTs8ZS
=Xhqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2012-08-22 04:12:31 | Re: multi-master pgbench? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-08-22 03:04:05 | Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |