| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Jesper Krogh'" <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
| Date: | 2012-08-22 03:04:05 |
| Message-ID: | 003a01cd8012$caf3bbb0$60db3310$@kapila@huawei.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Jesper Krogh [mailto:jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:13 AM
On 21/08/12 16:57, Amit kapila wrote:
>>Test results:
>>1. The pgbench test run for 10min.
>> 2. The test reult is for modified pgbench (such that total row size is
1800 and updated columns are of length 300) tpc-b testcase.
>> The result and modified pgbench code is attached with mail.
>> 3. The performance improvement shown in the m/c I have tested is quite
good (more than 100% for sync commit = off).
> I cannot comment on completeness or correctness of the code, but I do
think a relevant test would be
> to turn synchronous_commit on as default.
> Even though you aim at an improved performance, it would be nice to see
the reduction in WAL-size
>as an effect of this patch.
Yes, I shall take care of doing both the above tests and send the report.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2012-08-22 03:35:39 | Re: multi-master pgbench? |
| Previous Message | Wang, Chaoyong | 2012-08-22 02:52:04 | Re: problem when optimizing the window aggregation |