From: | "Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Talha Khan" <talha(dot)amjad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Ed Loehr" <ed(at)loehrtech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.1.2 postmaster died |
Date: | 2006-11-09 06:52:48 |
Message-ID: | bf54be870611082252n4c190d9dp133501163a3ebaf4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Have a look at "16.4.3. Linux Memory Overcommit" on
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/kernel-resources.html
Thanks,
------
Shoaib Mir
EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com)
On 11/9/06, Talha Khan <talha(dot)amjad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> I don't think its pgsql thats sending the SIGKILL its being done by the
> OS. The reason can only be confirmed after looking at your log files but the
> probability is that your OS ran out of memory and in order to protect itself
> it had to kill the processes that were taking a lot of memory thus ended up
> killing pgsql processes. Its just a hunch that i have but the reason can
> only be confirmed after seeing your logs.
>
> Regards
> Talha Khan
>
> On 11/9/06, Ed Loehr <ed(at)loehrtech(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday November 8 2006 12:30 pm, Shoaib Mir wrote:
> > > To be specific you need to look at the syslogs to see if it
> > > was actually some OOM killer or not.
> >
> > I checked all db logs + syslog, of course. All they show is the
> > process receiving SIGKILL (followed by all others being shutdown
> > as a result).
> >
> > Is there any circumstance at all under which pgsql itself would
> > issue a sigkill to one of the backends?
> >
> > Ed
> >
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas H. | 2006-11-09 07:53:50 | Re: planer picks a bad plan (seq-scan instead of index) |
Previous Message | surabhi.ahuja | 2006-11-09 06:36:34 | reproducing this issue on PG 8.0.0 ERROR: index "patient_pkey" is not a btree |