Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml
Date: 2019-08-17 04:38:05
Message-ID: bf0b706b7c4ab0f3f298b5d1c09f0b2c@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2019-08-16 07:22, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2019-08-16 02:26, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> * Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
>>> attached
>
>> they seem to be simply removing words and removing content that is
>
> For what it's worth, I think the proposed changes are all solid
> improvements. The text reads better with them, and that's what this is
> about -- not whether the removed little text-pieces were 'true' or
> not.
>
>
> However, there is one typo:
>
> + read independently. There are many extrernal programming
>
> extrernal -> external
> (and I would say that dropping that word 'external' would be another
> little improvement)

and:

Lasty -> Lastly

importantance -> importance

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-08-18 15:13:24 @> (contains)
Previous Message Liudmila Mantrova 2019-08-16 17:41:40 Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml