Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml
Date: 2019-08-16 05:22:39
Message-ID: 996bcfe233f558276f4f5962673ba164@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2019-08-16 02:26, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
>> attached

> they seem to be simply removing words and removing content that is

For what it's worth, I think the proposed changes are all solid
improvements. The text reads better with them, and that's what this is
about -- not whether the removed little text-pieces were 'true' or not.

However, there is one typo:

+ read independently. There are many extrernal programming

extrernal -> external
(and I would say that dropping that word 'external' would be another
little improvement)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-08-16 11:03:07 Wrong drop procedure example
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-08-16 00:26:23 Re: readability changes to postgres.sgml