Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Andreas Rogge <andreas(dot)rogge(at)bareos(dot)com>, pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
Date: 2025-03-12 14:32:00
Message-ID: beffb1ce0e9136e7f5e151ac00bd65d895d05dc1.camel@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-pkg-yum

Hi,

On Tue, 2025-03-11 at 18:36 +0100, Andreas Rogge wrote:
> I don't know what you claim, but your libpq5 RPM claims that the
> contained libpq.so.5 has versioned symbols for versions RHPG_9.6,
> RHPG_10, [...] and RHPG_15 while the contained library doesn't have
> these.
> When a package says it provides something and then doesn't, I call
> that a broken package.

We don't provide versioned *symbols*. It is just provides. Why would we
match Red Hat packaging?

Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Rogge 2025-03-12 14:55:56 Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-03-12 14:06:41 Re: BUG #18839: ARMv7 builds fail due to missing __crc32cw and similar

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2025-03-12 14:37:09 Re: postgresql17-debugsource-17.4 for Fedora 41 missing?
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2025-03-12 13:40:22 New platform alert: RHEL 9 - ppc64le