Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides

From: Andreas Rogge <andreas(dot)rogge(at)bareos(dot)com>
To: pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
Date: 2025-03-12 14:55:56
Message-ID: a3456aeb-8af3-4c0d-b890-6ffa853f5773@bareos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-pkg-yum

Am 12.03.25 um 15:32 schrieb Devrim Gündüz:
> We don't provide versioned *symbols*.
That's correct.

> It is just provides.
Is it also "just dependencies"? We all know that stuff is there for a
reason.

> Why would we match Red Hat packaging?
That's exactly what I'm asking: How did you end up with these provides?
Why did someone manually add these to the SPEC if it was not to match
the Red Hat package?

Best Regards,
Andreas
--
Andreas Rogge andreas(dot)rogge(at)bareos(dot)com
Bareos GmbH & Co. KG Phone: +49 221-630693-86
http://www.bareos.com

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln | Amtsgericht Köln: HRA 29646
Komplementär: Bareos Verwaltungs-GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Stephan Dühr, Jörg Steffens, Philipp Storz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2025-03-12 14:59:20 Re: BUG #18830: ExecInitMerge Segfault on MERGE
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2025-03-12 14:32:00 Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2025-03-13 10:08:13 Re: BUG #18833: libpq.so doesn't contain declared symbol in rpm --provides
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-03-12 14:37:09 Re: postgresql17-debugsource-17.4 for Fedora 41 missing?