Re: How useful is the money datatype?

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How useful is the money datatype?
Date: 2009-10-03 11:10:56
Message-ID: bddc86150910030410i18cdaee8q71df42ae1e594b00@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2009/10/3 Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>

>
> Here's how I represent currency values:
>
> CREATE DOMAIN currency
> AS numeric(10,2);
>
>
>
See, I can understand why someone might take the extra step to create a
domain for storing monetary units. The fact that money is in the
documentation, but contains no notes to explain that it's only there for
backward-compatibility lead me to wonder if it still had relevance, which I
gather it doesn't really. I'll avoid using it as it only appears to
introduce unnecessary limitations with very little advantages.

Thom

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2009-10-03 11:20:57 Re: How useful is the money datatype?
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-10-03 10:53:12 Re: How useful is the money datatype?