| From: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: How useful is the money datatype? | 
| Date: | 2009-10-03 11:10:56 | 
| Message-ID: | bddc86150910030410i18cdaee8q71df42ae1e594b00@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
2009/10/3 Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
>
> Here's how I represent currency values:
>
> CREATE DOMAIN currency
>  AS numeric(10,2);
>
>
>
See, I can understand why someone might take the extra step to create a
domain for storing monetary units.  The fact that money is in the
documentation, but contains no notes to explain that it's only there for
backward-compatibility lead me to wonder if it still had relevance, which I
gather it doesn't really.  I'll avoid using it as it only appears to
introduce unnecessary limitations with very little advantages.
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2009-10-03 11:20:57 | Re: How useful is the money datatype? | 
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-10-03 10:53:12 | Re: How useful is the money datatype? |