| From: | Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How useful is the money datatype? |
| Date: | 2009-10-03 11:20:57 |
| Message-ID: | 4AC73399.10007@iol.ie |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 03/10/2009 11:53, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> depending on the countries, etc - keep currencies in 10.4 , or you can
> compromise to 10.3 , otherwise you might run into problems with
> rounding, etc.
I thought the idea of NUMERIC was that the value was exact, avoiding
rounding problems that you might get with other floating-point types?
Ray.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie
Galway Cathedral Recitals: http://www.galwaycathedral.org/recitals
------------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-10-03 11:34:43 | Re: How useful is the money datatype? |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2009-10-03 11:10:56 | Re: How useful is the money datatype? |