| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | navbarry(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3) |
| Date: | 2024-01-11 15:05:51 |
| Message-ID: | bdbe9e25a7696268bc4c406d24e93c7dedaa72e9.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 14:44 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Thanks, applied and backpatched all the way.
Thanks for taking care of that!
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Russell, John | 2024-01-11 18:55:03 | Question on doc for RETURNING clause |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2024-01-11 13:44:16 | Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-11 15:08:31 | Re: Should the archiver process always make sure that the timeline history files exist in the archive? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-01-11 15:01:16 | Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade |