From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade |
Date: | 2024-01-11 15:01:16 |
Message-ID: | 67940.1704985276@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> "The logical replication launcher is disabled during binary upgrades, to
> avoid logical replication workers running on the source cluster. That
> would cause replication origins to move forward after having been copied
> to the target cluster, potentially creating conflicts with the copied
> data files."
"avoid logical replication workers running" still seems like shaky
grammar. Perhaps s/avoid/avoid having/, or write "to prevent logical
replication workers from running ...".
Also perhaps s/would/could/.
Otherwise +1
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2024-01-11 15:05:51 | Re: Postgres Partitions Limitations (5.11.2.3) |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-01-11 14:58:24 | Re: Test slots invalidations in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl only if dead rows are removed |