| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, lizenko79(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17073: docs - "Improve signal handling reliability" |
| Date: | 2021-07-01 02:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | bd94efd2-7d1e-569b-dc0e-dc0f458f7c00@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2021/07/01 10:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jun-30, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 5:54 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>
>>> Since this explains the commit 2945a488a, it's better to describe
>>> something like the following?
>
>> The wording still needs some work...but is this even release note worthy?
>>
>> We forget to check for interrupts before sleeping in an otherwise busy-wait
>> loop. We corrected the oversight.
>
> Yeah, it's a good question. I wonder if this should be back-patched, so
> it'd be noted as a bugfix in the next set of minors rather than as a new
> feature for 14.
Yes. I'm not sure why I did not back-patch the change, but IMO it's worth doing that.
Barring any objection, I will do that.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-01 03:47:46 | Re: Postregres-9.3 redhad 7 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-01 01:57:17 | Re: BUG #17073: docs - "Improve signal handling reliability" |