From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)jirotech(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 |
Date: | 2019-09-02 21:55:13 |
Message-ID: | ba89d093-8017-3819-605b-38dd55ddb493@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 9/2/19 2:45 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 7:41 am, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 9/2/19 2:20 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
> >
> > So this is a separate cluster from the one you used
> pg_upgrade on?
> >
> >
> > In that case yes it was seperate
> >
> >
> >
> > In other words when doing pg_upgrade you could not get a working
> > cluster, correct?
> >
> >
> > Pg_upgrade does not complete - but as it hasn’t started migrating
> data I
> > can start it and it’s fine (except for postgis which is now in a
> partial
> > install state)
>
> Now I will actually respond to list:)
>
> So from your original post:
>
> 1) "The tablename table gets created causing the above error"
>
> Is 'tablename' a user table or part of PostGIS?
>
>
> The tablename table is a user table, spatial_ref_sys is a postgis table.
I am going to assume then that it has to do with this:
"LINE 39: "location_pt" "public"."geography"(Point,4283), "
What is the above pointing to?
>
> 2) "Both the versions have PostGIS 2.5.1 installed and working"
>
> How do you know it is working on the 11 version?
>
>
> By version I mean 11 - I can init a new cluster and it’s fine
>
> The more I look at this it seems like:
>
> A) pg_upgrade somehow creates postgis without supporting tables
So you see a CREATE EXTENSION postgis?
Is there anything in the logs that pertains to the above?
> B) while the tables would be created from the schema dump files, they
> happen too late
What happens if you use pg_dump from version 11 against the 9.6 cluster
with the -s and -p?
Does it shows the schema creation in the order you need?
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
>
> > James Sewell,
> > Chief Architect
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>
> --
> James Sewell,
> Chief Architect
>
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, 26-32 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009
> P (+61) 2 8099 9000 W www.jirotech.com
> <http://www.jirotech.com> F (+61) 2 8099 9099
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal
> or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that
> this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received
> this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of
> it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the
> sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Sewell | 2019-09-02 23:57:47 | Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 |
Previous Message | James Sewell | 2019-09-02 21:45:42 | Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 |