Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11

On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 7:41 am, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 9/2/19 2:20 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
> >
> > So this is a separate cluster from the one you used pg_upgrade on?
> >
> >
> > In that case yes it was seperate
> >
> >
> >
> > In other words when doing pg_upgrade you could not get a working
> > cluster, correct?
> >
> >
> > Pg_upgrade does not complete - but as it hasn’t started migrating data I
> > can start it and it’s fine (except for postgis which is now in a partial
> > install state)
>
> Now I will actually respond to list:)
>
> So from your original post:
>
> 1) "The tablename table gets created causing the above error"
>
> Is 'tablename' a user table or part of PostGIS?
>
>
The tablename table is a user table, spatial_ref_sys is a postgis table.

2) "Both the versions have PostGIS 2.5.1 installed and working"
>
> How do you know it is working on the 11 version?

By version I mean 11 - I can init a new cluster and it’s fine

The more I look at this it seems like:

A) pg_upgrade somehow creates postgis without supporting tables
B) while the tables would be created from the schema dump files, they
happen too late

>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
>
> > James Sewell,
> > Chief Architect
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
--
James Sewell,
Chief Architect

Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, 26-32 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P (+61) 2 8099 9000 W www.jirotech.com F (+61) 2 8099 9099

--
The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or
professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this
email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this
communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or
otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your
incorrect receipt of this correspondence.