| From: | Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile |
| Date: | 2017-04-21 16:07:13 |
| Message-ID: | ba54d8fa-603f-c789-2bc4-e6e86b7b01b2@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Le 21/04/2017 à 17:45, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
>> I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the
>> one-to-many table is a many-to-many.
> Well, it'd depend on how it was used. The example clearly intends that
> it be one-to-many, and I'm not sure it still makes sense without that
> restriction. Maybe better to add a unique constraint on
> one_to_many(left)?
Perhaps the whole example can be simplified to get rid of the "left"
table, but I didn't intend to rewrite it.
>> And my colleague Thibaut Madeleine has seen that the "CREATE TABLE
>> right" and "CREATE TABLE left" examples cannot compile due to the
>> reserved words.
> Ouch. Shows you how old this module is :-(
Indeed.
>> I propose the attached patch to fix that.
> Um, the attached file seems empty from here.
Ooops, sorry. It is attached.
--
Christophe Courtois
Consultant Dalibo
http://dalibo.com/ - http://dalibo.org/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| intagg.sgml.patch | text/x-patch | 3.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-21 19:33:50 | Re: There is one "a" too much |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-21 15:45:16 | Re: intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile |