| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile |
| Date: | 2017-04-21 15:45:16 |
| Message-ID: | 15516.1492789516@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
> I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the
> one-to-many table is a many-to-many.
Well, it'd depend on how it was used. The example clearly intends that
it be one-to-many, and I'm not sure it still makes sense without that
restriction. Maybe better to add a unique constraint on
one_to_many(left)?
> And my colleague Thibaut Madeleine has seen that the "CREATE TABLE
> right" and "CREATE TABLE left" examples cannot compile due to the
> reserved words.
Ouch. Shows you how old this module is :-(
> I propose the attached patch to fix that.
Um, the attached file seems empty from here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christophe Courtois | 2017-04-21 16:07:13 | Re: intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile |
| Previous Message | Christophe Courtois | 2017-04-21 15:12:58 | intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile |