| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on? |
| Date: | 2017-04-21 14:09:54 |
| Message-ID: | b970888f-ec57-b93d-7ce2-e8fe8ac2a11b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/20/17 22:24, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:09:54PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think we're not really sure yet what to do about this. Discussion is
>> ongoing. I'll report back on Wednesday.
>
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update, and this is
> overall the seventh time you have you allowed one of your open items to go out
> of compliance. Kindly start complying with the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
We are actively working on it. It should be resolved within a few days.
Next check-in Monday.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-04-21 14:11:36 | Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-04-21 14:09:09 | Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on? |