| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Date: | 2025-02-05 01:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | b8a67d6dd34fe5e1b61272d11d40e5f576a00a0a.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 01:38 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> How did you propose to submit/track the status? Would it be sent to
> the
> mailing list, or would it be entered into the CF app while adding the
> patch to the next commitfest? (The latter wouldn't have the problem
> of
> cluttering the mailing list, but the information would be "split".)
The former: sent to -hackers as a normal message in the thread. I don't
think we should make it overly formal. It should flow with the rest of
the conversation as a periodic patch summary, which many authors
already do when threads start to get too long.
And if it would add zero information, no need to send it.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-02-05 01:40:41 | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-02-05 01:32:07 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |