Re: new commitfest transition guidance

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new commitfest transition guidance
Date: 2025-02-05 01:40:41
Message-ID: 038981a31f5a562099596458ab4f6a3718003630.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 20:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I am very strong -1 on the idea of requiring a status email before a
> entry can be pushed to the next CF.

OK, I retract the idea.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Fittl 2025-02-05 02:09:50 Re: [PATCH] Optionally record Plan IDs to track plan changes for a query
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-02-05 01:33:50 Re: new commitfest transition guidance