From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |
Date: | 2016-06-16 14:02:17 |
Message-ID: | b8862599-2840-68e8-55f7-cb5fd181753c@timbira.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01-06-2016 20:52, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> I think at least three of the four aggregate functions are little used,
> so I do not think many users would be affected. And only min(citext) and
> max(citext) can make use of the parallel aggregation.
>
> The functions are:
>
> min(citext)
> max(citext)
> int_array_aggregate(int4)
> rewrite(tsquery[])
>
I don't think those functions are used a lot (as you said) to justify
adding more code in 9.6. Let's not be in a hurry on something that can
wait some months.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2016-06-16 14:35:56 | Re: pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay |
Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2016-06-16 13:15:28 | Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions |