Re: pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay
Date: 2016-06-16 14:35:56
Message-ID: 818a499e-6707-985a-a9bb-93c88dacf324@timbira.com.br
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16-06-2016 09:05, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Shouldn't pg_upgrade turn off vacuum cost delay when it vacuums the new
> cluster? Not talking about the post-analyze script, but when it runs
> vacuumdb to analyze and freeze before loading the new schema, in
> prepare_new_cluster()? Those run during downtime, so it seems like you'd
> want those to run as fast as possible.
>
Doesn't --new-options do the job?

--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-06-16 14:45:14 Re: pg_upgrade vs vacuum_cost_delay
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2016-06-16 14:02:17 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions