From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Questions on Upgrading PostgreSQL from 15.0 to 15.9 and Setting Up Streaming Replication |
Date: | 2024-11-24 21:58:01 |
Message-ID: | b5473e72-b8f8-4aa0-8759-046628e93348@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/24/24 13:00, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:55 PM Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com
> <mailto:xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 24, 2024, at 09:15, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't the existence of a replication slot force PG to retain
> WAL files when replication is broken?
>
> It does. I don't recall if the OP said that they were using a
> persistent replication slot or not; it's not as common with binary
> replication as with logical replication.
>
>
> Really? I wonder why people fight with configuring max_wal_size and
> wal_keep_size, when replication slots do all the work for you.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logicaldecoding-explanation.html
"
Caution
Replication slots persist across crashes and know nothing about the
state of their consumer(s). They will prevent removal of required
resources even when there is no connection using them. This consumes
storage because neither required WAL nor required rows from the system
catalogs can be removed by VACUUM as long as they are required by a
replication slot. In extreme cases this could cause the database to shut
down to prevent transaction ID wraparound (see Section 24.1.5). So if a
slot is no longer required it should be dropped.
"
"
Caution
There is a chance that the old primary is up again during the promotion
and if subscriptions are not disabled, the logical subscribers may
continue to receive data from the old primary server even after
promotion until the connection string is altered. This might result in
data inconsistency issues, preventing the logical subscribers from being
able to continue replication from the new primary server.
"
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/warm-standby.html#STREAMING-REPLICATION
"
Caution
Beware that replication slots can cause the server to retain so many WAL
segments that they fill up the space allocated for pg_wal.
max_slot_wal_keep_size can be used to limit the size of WAL files
retained by replication slots.
"
They have their issues also, namely they may not do all the work for you.
>
> --
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-11-24 22:15:18 | Re: Questions on Upgrading PostgreSQL from 15.0 to 15.9 and Setting Up Streaming Replication |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-11-24 21:00:08 | Re: Questions on Upgrading PostgreSQL from 15.0 to 15.9 and Setting Up Streaming Replication |