On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:55 PM Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2024, at 09:15, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't the existence of a replication slot force PG to retain WAL files
> when replication is broken?
>
> It does. I don't recall if the OP said that they were using a persistent
> replication slot or not; it's not as common with binary replication as with
> logical replication.
>
Really? I wonder why people fight with configuring max_wal_size and
wal_keep_size, when replication slots do all the work for you.
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!