From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach |
Date: | 2019-05-14 10:38:01 |
Message-ID: | b4babc3b-710c-a5ab-5159-de802afcf8f8@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/05/2019 01:31, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 02/05/2019 10:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 29/04/2019 16:16, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
>>> In previous emails, I have sent two patches with test and bugfix (see
>>> attached).
>>> After Heikki shared his concerns, I've rechecked the algorithm and
>>> haven't found any potential error.
>>> So, if other hackers are agreed with my reasoning, the suggested fix is
>>> sufficient and can be committed.
>>
>> I still believe there is a problem with grandparent splits with this.
>> I'll try to construct a test case later this week, unless you manage to
>> create one before that.
>
> Here you go. If you apply the two patches from
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5d48ce28-34cf-9b03-5d42-dbd5457926bf%40postgrespro.ru,
> and run the attached script, it will print out something like this:
>
> postgres=# \i grandparent.sql
> DROP TABLE
> CREATE TABLE
> INSERT 0 150000
> CREATE INDEX
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 10000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 20000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 30000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 40000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 50000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 60000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 70000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 80000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 90000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 100000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 110000
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: failed for 114034
> psql:grandparent.sql:27: NOTICE: working on 120000
> DO
>
> That "failed for 114034" should not happen.
>
> Fortunately, that's not too hard to fix. We just need to arrange things
> so that the "retry_from_parent" flag also gets set for the grandparent,
> when the grandparent is split. Like in the attached patch.
I hear no objections, so pushed that. But if you have a chance to review
this later, just to double-check, I'd still appreciate that.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2019-05-14 11:13:24 | Re: Tab completion for CREATE TYPE |
Previous Message | Stas Kelvich | 2019-05-14 09:53:31 | Read-only access to temp tables for 2PC transactions |