| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |
| Date: | 2018-12-12 04:23:02 |
| Message-ID: | b471be1c-df7a-162e-6d18-f3c9b768e0c3@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/11/18 9:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-12-12 11:32:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> +1 on all that. Per the trend of this thread, I see a bunch of
>> committers and contributors commenting about *not* removing this code,
>> so sending a patch to actually remove it looks like a throw into an
>> abysmal void.
>
> I don't think it's as clear as you make it out to be:
>
> In favor:
> - David Steele
> - Andres Freund
> - Stephen Frost, I think
> Against:
> - Simon Riggs
> - Robert Haas
> - Michael Paquier
> - Andreas Karlsson
> - Peter Eisentraut, I think
>
> While that's clearly lopsided, I still think it's pretty darn absurd to
> call such a situation "a throw into an abysmal void".
I didn't get the impression that Peter was against, he just thought that
it needed to stand on its own, rather than be justified by the
recovery.conf changes, which I agree with.
Simon rather clearly said that he thinks we should wait until the next
release, which I don't see as being entirely against.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2018-12-12 04:27:30 | Re: Add timeline to partial WAL segments |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-12-12 04:21:32 | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |