Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Date: 2018-12-12 04:21:32
Message-ID: 5bc2e94d-a068-8423-37f6-6e7ea6879633@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/27/18 10:05 AM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 11/27/18 3:46 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> I'm concerned, seriously, that people don't have anywhere near the
>> concern about the recovery side of things as they do about the backup
>> side of things and that's really concerning.
>
> I think we should use more caution when data loss is at stake rather
> than "just" downtime. So personally I am in favor of updating the manual
> with warnings (right now it does not even say if exclusive or
> non-exclusive is the default) and adding a deprecation warning when
> people use the exclusive mode.

The documentation says (since 9.6):

Low level base backups can be made in a non-exclusive or an exclusive
way. The non-exclusive method is recommended and the exclusive one is
deprecated and will eventually be removed.

That seems clear enough to me.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2018-12-12 04:23:02 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-12-12 04:18:28 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode