From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dhritman Roy <dhritman(dot)roy(at)NetCracker(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: dblink Future support vs FDW |
Date: | 2024-06-27 17:08:10 |
Message-ID: | b2bc5ffe-4b00-4266-9f86-fc25309e62f1@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/27/24 08:32, Dhritman Roy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.
>
> I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink (
> it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously
> do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few
> months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new
> version.
I would say that is highly unlikely. Even if it where to happen at some
point in the distant future you still have:
Open source code under a permissive license that you could keep running
with.
>
> Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful
> for us and highly appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> ROY.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential,
> proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
> the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marthin Laubscher | 2024-06-27 17:26:19 | Re: Alignment check |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-06-27 17:03:46 | Re: Alignment check |