From: | Dhritman Roy <dhritman(dot)roy(at)NetCracker(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | dblink Future support vs FDW |
Date: | 2024-06-27 15:32:13 |
Message-ID: | 609c8cd402e145e2af12bcfe20ac22e1@NetCracker.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.
So, if I have broken any protocols/rules or violated any code of conduct then please do forgive and guide me. Thanks.
My organization is building something which is using dblink and what we are building shall take several months and then to be offered to a client.
I just wanted to check what is the future/roadmap of dblink?
Is it going to be obsolete/removed from PostGreSQL in upcoming versions?
I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new version.
Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful for us and highly appreciated.
Regards
ROY.
________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | agharta82@gmail.com | 2024-06-27 15:33:13 | Re: A way to optimize sql about the last temporary-related row |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-06-27 15:27:40 | Re: A way to optimize sql about the last temporary-related row |