Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Paul Foerster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38
Date: 2024-09-22 13:47:04
Message-ID: b281ad68-efb5-40d3-b03b-5d7c1e111914@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/21/24 15:19, Paul Foerster wrote:
> I already expressed the idea of changing all locales to ICU. The
> problem there is that I'd have to create new instances and then move
> each database individually. I wish I could convert already running
> databases… This also takes time. Still, I think I'm going to try
> this route. It's always a gamble if reindexing is needed or not with
> any glibc change.

Note that moving to ICU might improve things, but there are similar
potential issues with ICU as well. The trick there would be to get your
OS distro provider to maintain the same ICU version across major
versions of the distro, which is not the case currently. Nor does the
PGDG repo do that.

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaheed Haque 2024-09-22 13:59:34 Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38
Previous Message Lok P 2024-09-22 05:21:07 Re: How batch processing works