From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add ps display while waiting for wal in read_local_xlog_page_guts |
Date: | 2023-04-13 06:05:27 |
Message-ID: | b2481960-4c1b-9811-3ec0-c2ab2f47de9c@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 4/13/23 4:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarthi22(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> pg_create_logical_replication_slot can take longer than usual on a standby
>> when there is no activity on the primary. We don't have enough information
>> in the pg_stat_activity or process title to debug why this is taking so
>> long. Attached a small patch to update the process title while waiting for
>> the wal in read_local_xlog_page_guts.
Thanks for the patch!
> Any thoughts on introducing a new
>> wait event too?
>
> set_ps_display is a fairly expensive operation on a lot of platforms,
> so I'm concerned about the overhead this proposal would add. However,
> getting rid of that pg_usleep in favor of a proper wait event seems
> like a good idea.
>
+1 for adding a proper wait event.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-04-13 06:12:44 | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-04-13 06:02:48 | Re: Add ps display while waiting for wal in read_local_xlog_page_guts |