From: | Jan Branbergen <jan(at)evation(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems with Now()? |
Date: | 2002-11-05 23:23:38 |
Message-ID: | aq9jto$eh1$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
i am responding to a thread back in august. someone discussed his problems
with the changed Now() precision. this issue has come on my plate with a
7.1.3. to 7.2.3 upgrade.
i encountered the same problem, and although there are work-around (
replacing def-vals from now() to current_timpestamp(3) ), in my opinion,
there continues to be a problem with Access/ODBC ( don't know which one...
i think Access ):
although my timestamp field got assigned a precision of 6 below seconds (
through def-val now() ), access ( or ODBC driver ) tries to match to the
record with only 3 below seconds, and hence will not find the record.
this is a PINTA, since because of this i can not update these records from
Access anymore ( it is comparing '2002-11-04 16:03:27.123467' to
'2002-11-04 16:03:27.123' ).
not a big problem for me, but i think you guys should know, and the original
thread was not clear in pointing out the real problem IMHO.
regards,
Jan ( sorry for the brackets )
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Bartley | 2002-11-06 01:48:06 | Vacuum full |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-05 23:16:37 | Re: Buffers and MacOS X |