From: | Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Raymond O'Donnell" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient? |
Date: | 2009-01-29 17:01:52 |
Message-ID: | alpine.LFD.2.00.0901291759490.16134@bbs.intern |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello Ray,
Yes, that's clear. But there was even some stuff which isn't dumped with
pg_dumpall (as far as I read).
So it was like to run 2 statements like:
1.) Run pg_dumpall
2.) Run pg_dump additionally ...
Ciao,
Gerhard
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> On 29/01/2009 16:31, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>
>> I recently read some Mail on the mailinglist where some parts of
>> PostgreSQL were not dumped with pg_dumpall and additionally some pg_dump
>> was necessary (it was something like internals, catalog, etc.)
>
> It's the other way around - pg_dump dumps just the specified database,
> but not cluster-wide stuff like login roles; you need to do a pg_dumpall
> to get those as well.
>
> Ray.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
> rod(at)iol(dot)ie
> Galway Cathedral Recitals: http://www.galwaycathedral.org/recitals
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Long | 2009-01-29 17:04:17 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-29 17:01:09 | Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient? |